Unfortunately, I have also regular work to do. I did get just a little further with the single file download approach, so if I were to want to go waste another two or three days trying, I'd probably go waste that time on that approach as there was a little more "hope" there, teasing me about a success I probably will never have in hand. I put in equal time on both of them and received pretty much the same results. I definitely attempted both the single file download (not recommended) as well as the recommended approach. (My first experience with them.) It's quite a contrast, frankly. Not so with what I've experienced from Xilinx, this last week. But when I call, they are very very helpful each and every time despite that fact. I'm also a hobbyist with Microchip, who cannot hope to expect anything from me in terms of large globs of revenue. And nothing even close on the machine I'm currently using. I've never in my life experienced a downloader exhibiting so much difficulty or a company so unwilling to discuss getting access to their software to use their devices. I'm currently ignorant about other alternatives and a letter to Xilinx Sales merely directed me away from them and to their forum for support. If there is any other alternative idea about getting the software installed on my machine, I'd love to hear it. I also should note that I'm running a 64-bit version of the Unified Installer to match the 64-bit version of Windows 10 Professional that I'm running. I like to make things as crystal clear as I can. I'm including 10 screen-shots (it's 10 steps to get from "unpacking" the software to "first error message") in case any of it helps to clarify what I'm seeing at my end. (I don't have any other such software on this machine and it's a personal machine without any corporate proxies, etc.) No change in the behavior regardless of what I do.Īny thoughts about what else I might try would be greatly appreciated - especially if they work!! I did turn off the Microsoft Defender firewall, just in case. But this software has difficulties quite early in the process (as little as 1 Gb or less and I'm already getting continual errors.) Some of that software has been equally large (Microsoft MSDN downloads can be very large, at times.) I've never had any difficulties. The machine is a very plain Windows 10 Professional system that I've been using for four years (more) without any difficulties from any other hardware or software providers. I've been almost a week (not quite) trying to use the installer. This is probably not the time for that, though.I've posted a question at the Xilinx forum already on this topic: Here. Also you really should get at least a little bit acquainted with Linux sooner or later if you are studying something which involves installing Vivado for a course. I'd give a Docker based system a try if you're into that kind of thing. At any rate "you will WANT to reformat your harddrive after you're done using Vivado" is probably what your lecturer meant.Īs to what system to recommend: one's honestly as good as the next. Maybe there's an uninstaller that will delete the Desktop Icon but leave Gigs of trash laying around and uncountable orphaned registry entries on Windows. More or less any system you install it on will be seriously fucked up afterwards unless you install it in some sort of sandbox. In case you are using Linux you will probably have to physically change your monitors resolution because all the text is either elephantine or too small to read with no method to adjust it via Settings. Once that new harddrive arrives from Amazon you can finish you're install which will include no fewer than 7 different full jdk installs and an editor that can't even pretty-print verilog. These will result in another afternoon of downloads. This, of course, is only the java based installer which will present you with a myriad of incomprehensible download options during the install. Unless there have been major changes, you'll spend an afternoon downloading a 17GB monstrosity from the world's slowest download mirror. Vivado is a horrid piece of software from a usability perspective, or at least was the last time I used it two or so years ago. Vendors make money selling FPGAs not tooling.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |